Relationship between Fish Size and Otolith Length for 63 Species of Fishes from the Eastern North Pacific Ocean
By J. Harvey, T. Loughlin, M. Perez, D. Oxman. 2000
212 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50c1bd3f81c164540aed42bba0c083a3203ab32a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Austen C. Thomas
- M. Lance
- P. Battaglia
- B. Deagle
- Benjamin W. Nelson
- U. Markaida
- D. Malara
- Wan-Ying Chang
Citations in the corpus
- Relationships between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina, Italy) (2010, methodology): “However, Harvey et al. (2000) indicated the small size of the sample as the possible cause of this diversity.”
- Feeding ecology of phocid seals and some walrus in the Alaskan and Canadian Arctic as determined by stomach contents and stable isotope analysis (2006, methodology): “…keys (Rathbun 1929; Akimushkin 1965; Keen and Coan 1974; Butler 1980; Frost and Lowry 1980; Frost 1981; Härkönen 1986; Kathman et al. 1986; Foster 1991; Jensen 1995; Harvey et al. 2000) were used for the identification of fish otoliths and invertebrate prey to the lowest possible taxonomic level.”
- Seabirds as indicators of food web structure and ecosystem variability: qualitative and quantitative diet analyses using fatty acids (2007, unknown): “…relationships between fish mass and otolith length and between squid mass and beak size, or by estimating lengths of prey lacking otoliths (e.g. fish without heads, other invertebrates) and using relationships relating estimated length to mass (e.g. Springer et al. 1996, Harvey et al. 2000).”
- Otolith morphology and body size relationships for juvenile Sciaenidae in the Río de la Plata estuary (35-36°S)* (2003, background): “The adequate identification of fish prey from otoliths is essential in feeding studies, where the relationship between otolith length and fish length or weight given by specific regressions can also be used to estimate the size and/or mass of prey (Harvey et al., 2000; Everson et al., 1999; Baldás e”
- Food and feeding habits of the blue shark Prionace glauca caught off Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico, with a review on its feeding (2010, methodology): “Fish standard lengths were estimated from otolith lengths using available relationships (Harvey et al., 2000).”
- Harbor Seal Diet in Northern Puget Sound: Implications for the Recovery of Depressed Fish Stocks (2012, methodology): “…Ser 464: 257–271, 2012 Prey were identified to the lowest possible taxon using a dissecting microscope, reference fish bone collections from Washington and Oregon, and published fish bone, otolith, and cephalopod beak keys (Morrow 1979, Wolff 1982, Clarke 1986, Cannon 1987, Harvey et al. 2000).”
- Harbour seals target juvenile salmon of conservation concern (2017, methodology): “All diagnostic prey hard parts were identified to the lowest possible taxon using a dissecting microscope and reference fish bones from Washington and British Columbia, in addition to published keys for fish bones and cephalopod beaks (Clarke 1986; Harvey et al. 2000; Kashiwada et al. 1979; Morrow 1”