Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species

By A. Agrawal. Science, 2001

1,624 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50b1e0b4ad8fa94b8231b3d83ccac2d6929d23d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity (2011, background): “High plasticity can be due either to an adaptive strategy to cope with spatiotemporal resource fluctuation in the native region (Williams, Mack & Black 1995; Atkin et al. 2005) or to rapid evolution in novel sites after colonization (Agrawal 2001; Yeh & Price 2004).”
Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics (2003, background): “Also, recent studies suggest that plastic changes in morphology and life history are important in creating trait-mediated indirect effects (Chase, 1999; Raimondi et al., 2000; Relyea, 2000; Agrawal, 2001; Langerhans and DeWitt, 2002).”
Parental effects in Pieris rapae in response to variation in food quality: adaptive plasticity across generations? (2003, background): “For example, adaptive parental effects have been demonstrated in Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae) in response to herbivory by P. rapae (Agrawal et al., 1999; Agrawal, 2001a).”
Ecological and evolutionary responses of Mediterranean plants to global change. (2014, positive): “As for other quantitative traits, lack of genetic variation for plasticity may be due to costs of plasticity, genetic correlations and past selection (DeWitt et al., 1998; Agrawal, 2001; Relyea, 2002).”
Behavioural response of bullfrog tadpoles to chemical cues of predation risk are affected by cue age and water source (2006, background): “Such responses can have profound effects on the fitness of the responding prey (Stearns, 1989; West-Eberhard, 1989; Agrawal, 2001).”
Ecological metabolomics: overview of current developments and future challenges (2011, background): “In this way, it advances our knowledge of the development of phenotypic plasticity (Via et al. 1995; Pigliucci 2005) and its evolutionary consequences (Agrawal 2001).”
Plant–soil feedbacks: connecting ecosystem ecology and evolution (2016, background): “These interactions can result in phenotypic shifts due to plasticity and may not always result in relatively fast reciprocal selection (Agrawal 2001; Fordyce 2006), but here we focus on the selective consequences of plant–microbe interactions.”
Introduction to a Special Issue on Genotype by Environment Interaction (2016, background): “These interactions have been associated with pleiotropic effects that can range from antagonistic effects to, what is most commonly observed, a differential sensitivity of alleles across environments (Scheiner, 1993; DeWitt et al., 1998; Agrawal, 2001; Pigliucci, 2005).”
Plasticity in pigmentation induced by conflicting threats from predation and UV radiation (2004, background): “Moreover, phenotypic plasticity may reflect spatial and temporal environmental fluctuations, as well as variations in species interactions, such as changes in predation pressure (Agrawal 2001).”
Thermal performance curves, phenotypic plasticity, and the time scales of temperature exposure. (2011, background): “Equally important, but beyond the scope of this review, is the likelihood of interactions between temperature and other abiotic and biotic environmental factors that can alter the relationship between temperature and performance, affecting both the TPC and its evolutionary trajectory (Agrawal 2001; ”