Statistical Evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001

By Hannu (TT) Toivonen, A. Srinivasan, Ross D. King, Stefan Kramer, C. Helma. 2003

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

MOTIVATION The development of in silico models to predict chemical carcinogenesis from molecular structure would help greatly to prevent environmentally caused cancers. The Predictive Toxicology Challenge (PTC) competition was organized to test the state-of-the-art in applying machine learning to form such predictive models. RESULTS Fourteen machine learning groups generated 111 models. The use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) space allowed the models to be uniformly compared regardless of the error cost function. We developed a statistical method to test if a model performs significantly better than random in ROC space. Using this test as criteria five models performed better than random guessing at a significance level p of 0.05 (not corrected for multiple testing). Statistically the best predictor was the Viniti model for female mice, with p value below 0.002. The toxicologically most interesting models were Leuven2 for male mice, and Kwansei for female rats. These models performed well in the statistical analysis and they are in the middle of ROC space, i.e. distant from extreme cost assumptions. These predictive models were also independently judged by domain experts to be among the three most interesting, and are believed to include a small but significant amount of empirically learned toxicological knowledge. AVAILABILITY PTC details and data can be found at: http://www.predictive-toxicology.org/ptc/.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Immunology, Molecular Biology, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Philip S. Yu
  2. Fabrizio Costa
  3. S. V. N. Vishwanathan
  4. Michalis Vazirgiannis
  5. D. Towsley
  6. Konstantin Kutzkov
  7. Qiaozhu Mei
  8. Feng Xia

In Immunology

  1. Chuan Zhou
  2. Shirui Pan

In Molecular Biology

  1. Philip S. Yu
  2. Fabrizio Costa
  3. James Atwood
  4. S. V. N. Vishwanathan
  5. Michalis Vazirgiannis
  6. D. Towsley
  7. Qiaozhu Mei
  8. Chuan Zhou

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Philip S. Yu
  3. Fabrizio Costa
  4. S. V. N. Vishwanathan
  5. Michalis Vazirgiannis
  6. Konstantin Kutzkov
  7. Qiaozhu Mei
  8. Pinar Yanardag

In Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

  1. Philip S. Yu
  2. Fabrizio Costa
  3. S. V. N. Vishwanathan
  4. Michalis Vazirgiannis
  5. Qiaozhu Mei
  6. Pinar Yanardag
  7. Giannis Nikolentzos
  8. Kurt De Grave

Citations in the corpus