Flowable Fills Developed With High Volumes of Fly Ash

By C. Swan, G. Topping, M. Kashi. 2007

1,947 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of colloidal nanosilica on rheological and mechanical properties of fly ash–cement mortar (2013, unknown): “Although according to ASTM C618 [24] both fly ashes fall under class F, the difference in aluminosilicate/ferrite content (SiO2% + Al2O3% + Fe2O3”
Fine limestone additions to regulate setting in high volume fly ash mixtures (2012, background): “While HVFA mixtures can exhibit superior long term strengths and durability in comparison to pure ordinary Portland cement mixtures, they also often exhibit problems with respect to retardation, delayed setting times, and low early age strengths [2–4], thus creating a gap between sustainability and…”
Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar (2018, methodology): “fly ash was collected from China and classified as class F as per ASTM C618-12a standard [21].”
Influence of particle size distributions on yield stress and viscosity of cement–fly ash pastes (2012, background): “The rheological properties of cement paste are critical to the field performance of concrete in terms of its slump, flow, and workability [1].”
Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method (2012, methodology): “1 Materials Fly ash could be classified as class F by ASTM C618-08 [9] from Collie power station, Western Australia, and Ordinary Portland Cement Type I as specified in AS 2350.”