Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application

By J. Gosse, F. Phillips. 2001

1,922 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50712bf05fcf4d7092623ac93cd05ff38d971d2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. J. Gosse
4. Marek Zreda
5. V. Laurent
6. L. Martin
7. Romain Delunel
8. Jérôme Lavé

In Geophysics

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda

In Molecular Biology

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Brian Borchers
4. Marek Zreda
5. B. Goehring
6. B. Singer
7. F. Phillips
8. K. Nishiizumi

Citations in the corpus

• A geologically constrained Monte Carlo approach to modeling exposure ages from profiles of cosmogenic nuclides: An example from Lees Ferry, Arizona (2010, methodology): “The total measurement error in TCN concentration should include the 1s AMS uncertainty measurement as well as additional 1s error associated with sample preparation and analysis (see Gosse and Phillips, 2001 for an estimate).”
• Cosmogenic nuclide chronology of millennial-scale glacial advances during O-isotope stage 2 in Patagonia (2004, background): “In addition, systematic uncertainties associated with calibration of production rates of cosmogenic nuclides, combined with scaling these rates to sea level and high latitude (SLHL), are estimated to be as high as 10–20% (see Gosse and Phillips, 2001).”
• Footprint characteristics revised for field‐scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic‐ray neutrons (2015, background): “Attenuation of high-energy neutrons in the soil follows an exponential decrease that is dependent on soil type and location on Earth [Gosse and Phillips, 2001].”
• An approach for optimizing in SITU cosmogenic 10BE sample preparation (2016, background): “Measurement of in situ produced cosmogenic 10Be in geologic samples provides insight about a wide variety of geologic processes (Bierman and Nichols, 2004; Gosse and Phillips, 2001; Granger et al., 2013; Nishiizumi et al., 1993; von Blanckenburg and Willenbring, 2014).”
• The CREp program and the ICE-D production rate calibration database: A fully parameterizable and updated online tool to compute cosmic-ray exposure ages (2017, methodology): “Then, this SLHL production rate is rescaled to the location of the surface to be dated (Balco et al., 2008; Gosse and Phillips, 2001).”
• Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project (2016, methodology): “In previously published papers, shielding informa-332 tion was typically not available and the standard attenuation length is333 calculated based on latitude, longitude, elevation, and pressure using334 methods discussed in Gosse & Phillips (2001).335 8.”