Mismatch Negativity: A Microphone into Auditory Memory

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Role of Mismatch Negativity and Novelty-P3 in Involuntary Auditory Attention (2007, background): “This is, therefore a “change-detector” mechanism, which has been associated to the generation of MMN (Näätänen, 1990, 2007; Schröger, 2007; Winkler, 2007), and can best be isolated by using slightly different distracter stimuli with regard to the repetitive stimulation (see an extended discussion on”
Prediction, Cognition and the Brain (2009, background): “As indicated by research related to the auditory mismatch negativity event-related component, predictions generated by representations of rules could also be formulated within a sensory, in this case auditory, system itself (Schröger, 2007; Winkler, 2007).”
Mismatch Negativity and Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in Animal Models (2007, background): “This issue was indeed recognized by the MMN community (Jacobsen & Schröger, 2001; Schröger, 2007).”
Back in time: Reversed speech as a window into cognitive language processing—A systematic review (2026, unknown): “…of these units is cognitively constrained in that certain memory systems (e.g., sensory memory or working memory) have transient properties: Information with-held there decays after specific time intervals (Baddeley, 1992, 2000; Schröger, 2007; Winkler et al., 1993; Zlot-nik & Vansintjan, 2019).”