The multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree approach

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A literature survey of low‐rank tensor approximation techniques (2013, neutral): “• the solution of high-dimensional Schrödinger equations [47, 161, 173, 185, 193, 194];”
A Dynamical Low-Rank Approach to the Chemical Master Equation (2008, methodology): “, [30, 3] and references therein) and have recently been investigated from the perspective of numerical analysis in [23].”
A projector-splitting integrator for dynamical low-rank approximation (2013, unknown): “In quantum dynamics, such an approach was used previously in the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method [11, 12] to determine an approximate solution to the time-dependent multi-particle Schrödinger equation, and the above minimization process is known there as the Dirac–Frenkel ti”
Dynamical Approximation by Hierarchical Tucker and Tensor-Train Tensors (2013, methodology): “(ii) Although the HT/TT formats were only recently introduced into the numerical analysis community, they have—similar to the parallels between the Tucker format and the formulation of the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method in quantum chemistry [5, 4, 22]—a considerable signifi”