Asymmetric relationship between green bonds and commodities: Evidence from extreme quantile approach
By M. Naeem, Thi Thu Hien Nguyen, Rabindra Nepal, Quang-Thanh Ngo, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary. 2021
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract The paper documents the asymmetric relationship between green bonds and commodities via the cross-quantilogram approach. Given the heterogeneity nature of individual commodities, we employ three commodity key groups, including energy, metals, and agriculture. As expected, the empirical evidence highlights the asymmetric behaviors of green bonds in response to diverse groups of commodities. Further, the hedging and diversification benefit of including green bonds to commodity portfolio is revealed. Defined by the uncorrelation or negative correlation with commodities in the periods of high volatility, we found the strongest hedging benefit of green bonds against the fluctuation of natural gas, some industrial metals, and agricultural commodities. While these underlying features are persistent in the long run, it is recommended to utilize the use of green bonds in the longer term (22 days) for higher portfolio performance rather than the short term (1 to 5 days).
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/504542b18d6e10e7d07af341df7eddf925ab7b35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Analyzing the Characteristics of Green Bond Markets to Facilitate Green Finance in the Post-COVID-19 World (2021, background): “[16,17] showed that the green bond market was more volatile and hence riskier than the conventional bond market.”