On Estimating X̄ Control Chart Limits

By G. Nedumaran, Joseph J. Pignatiello Jr.. 2001

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/501d2dfed627eae12a7a4b6741ceafb1fb4728e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. William H. Woodall
2. Peihua Qiu
3. Changliang Zou
4. Mahmoud A. Mahmoud
5. Philippe Castagliola
6. Nesma A. Saleh
7. Matthew J. Keefe
8. Douglas M. Hawkins

Citations in the corpus

• The Difficulty in Designing Shewhart X̄ and X Control Charts with Estimated Parameters (2015, methodology): “If one only considers the AARL values presented in Table 1 to determine the required number of phase I samples, the recommendations of Quesenberry (1993) and Chen (1997) would be reasonable, i.”
• The Changepoint Model for Statistical Process Control (2003, methodology): “The assumption of known in-control mean and standard deviation underlies both the standard charting methods (Shewhart, cusum, and EWMA charts), and the GLR changepoint approach set out by Lai (2001), Pignatiello and Samuel (2001), and Nedumaran and Pignatiello (2001).”
• The EWMA median chart with estimated parameters (2016, methodology): “Since the run length of the EWMAX̃ chart with known parameters is a Discrete PHase-type (or DPH) random variable of parameters (Q, q) (see, for instance, Neuts (1981) or Latouche and Ramaswami (1999)), then the”