Opening the black box: the promise and limitations of explainable machine learning in cardiology.

By J. Petch, Shuang Di, W. Nelson. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2021

507 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many clinicians remain wary of machine learning due to long-standing concerns about "black box" models. "Black box" is shorthand for models that are sufficiently complex that they are not straightforwardly interpretable to humans. Lack of interpretability in predictive models can undermine trust in those models, especially in health care where so many decisions are literally life and death. There has recently been an explosion of research in the field of explainable machine learning aimed at addressing these concerns. The promise of explainable machine learning is considerable, but it is important for cardiologists who may encounter these techniques in clinical decision support tools or novel research papers to have a critical understanding of both their strengths and their limitations. This paper reviews key concepts and techniques in the field of explainable machine learning as they apply to cardiology. Key concepts reviewed include interpretability versus explainability and global versus local explanations. Techniques demonstrated include permutation importance, surrogate decision trees, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and partial dependence plots. We discuss several limitations with explainability techniques, focusing on the how the nature of explanations as approximations may omit important information about how black box models work and why they make certain predictions. We conclude by proposing a rule of thumb about when it is appropriate to use black box models with explanations, rather than interpretable models.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5010f9203a036e67f82b8bbf6acf1e72d1382afc