Taxes and the Canadian Underground Economy
By Lindsay M. Tedds, David E. A. Giles. 2007
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5003676a9f151d3d6f79bd3f0ce6b68c4b385a96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- James Alm
- Abel Embaye
- M. Gómez-Antonio
- Era Dabla‐Norris
- Ángel Alañón-Pardo
- Gabriela Inchauste
- O. H. Solomon
- Friedrich Schneider
Citations in the corpus
- What Causes Firms to Hide Output?: The Determinants of Informality (2005, background): “The empirical literature relates the size of the informal sector to proxies such as the tax burden (e.g., Cebula, 1997; Giles and Tedds, 2002), entry costs (Auriol and Warlters, 2005); institutional quality and regulatory burden, in particular of labor (Friedman and others, 2000, Johnson and…”
- Using Dynamic Panel Methods to Estimate Shadow Economies Around the World, 1984–2006 (2013, background): “…for the U.K., Klovland (1984) for Norway and Sweden, Bajada (1999) for Australia, Giles (1999a, 1999b) for New Zealand, Schneider (1997, 2002) and Johnson, Kaufmann and Zoido-Lobato´n (1998) for OECD countries, Williams and Windebank (1995) for EU countries and Giles and Tedds (2002) for Canada.”
- The shadow economy in three Mediterranean countries: France, Spain and Greece. A MIMIC approach (2007, background): “As Giles and Tedds (2002) point out, the most appropriate way “.”
- New Estimates for the Shadow Economies all over the World (2010, unknown): “( 1998a , 1998b ); Tanzi (1999) ; Giles (1999a) ; Giles and Tedds (2002) ; Feld and Schneider (2010) .”
- The Influence of Public Institutions on the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Investigation for OECD Countries (2010, unknown): “…economy using the MIMIC model approach, the most common objection concerns the meaning of the latent variable (Helberger and Knepel (1988); Giles and Tedds (2002); Smith (2002); Hill (2002); Dell’Anno (2003)), because the MIMIC approach is largely a confirmatory rather than exploratory technique.”
- The size and development of the shadow economy: An empirical investigation from states of India (2006, unknown): “Giles (1999a,b), Giles and Caragata (2001), and Giles and Tedds (2002) have used the time series data for the New Zealand and the Canadian economy, to arrive at hidden economy estimates, using the MIMIC approach.”
- Shadow economy and unemployment rate in USA: is there a structural relationship? An empirical analysis (2008, background): “On the contrary, Giles and Tedds ( 2002 ) argue that the effect of unemployment on the SE is ambiguous (i.”