An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing

By Martin Eimer, A. Holmes. NeuroReport, 2002

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fe4958672083808c3c586b05b667fd40b2445c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions (2003, background): “It might also explain otherwise paradoxical electrophysiological findings that neural responses to fearful face expressions (∼120 ms after onset) can precede face-specific responses from ventral visual cortex (at ∼170 ms”
Emotional facial expressions evoke faster orienting responses, but weaker emotional responses at neural and behavioural levels compared to scenes: A simultaneous EEG and facial EMG study (2016, positive): “Affective modulation has even been reported as early as 100 ms post-stimulus (Batty and Taylor, 2003; Eger et al., 2003; Eimer and Holmes, 2002; Holmes et al., 2003; Pizzagalli et al., 1999; Pourtois et al., 2005; Recio et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2013; Streit et al., 2003).”
Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing (2006, methodology): “3 was slightly delayed relative to the onset latencies observed in our earlier study (Eimer & Holmes, 2002), where frontal differences between ERPs to upright fearful and neutral faces were already present at 120 ms post-stimulus (see Figs.”
Three Stages of Facial Expression Processing: ERP Study with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (2009, background): “…have demonstrated that N100, P1, VPP, and N170 are significantly affected by affect in the early phase of perception and attention processing (Eimer and Holmes, 2002; Batty and Taylor, 2003; Eger et al., 2003; Ashley et al., 2004; Carretié et al., 2004; Miyoshi et al., 2004; Bar-Haim et al.,…”
Emotional state classification from EEG data using machine learning approach (2014, neutral): “…EEGデータセットの実験結果から，我々はパワースペクトルの特徴は他の 2種類より優れていることを示す．また，線形動的システムに基づく特徴平滑化方法は感情分類精度を大きく向上させることを示し，感情変化の軌跡はマニホールド学習の学習対象に依存しない特徴量を低下させることで，可視化を可能とした． 5 キーワード Emotion classification, Electroencephalograph, Brain?computer interface, Feature reduction, Support vector machine, Manifold learning 6 参考文献”
Interpretive bias in social phobia: An ERP study with morphed emotional schematic faces (2009, result): “Presumably, such an emotional modulation of the N170 is only present when the identification of the facial emotion is explicitly task relevant, which might explain why some studies did not observe such an effect (Eimer & Holmes, 2002 ; Holmes, Vuilleumier, & Eimer, 2003 ; Schupp et al, 2004 ).”
Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. (2007, background): “Frontal regions discriminate fearful from neutral faces beginning at 100 ms (Eimer & Holmes, 2002; Holmes, Vuilleumier, & Eimer, 2003) and fearful from happy faces from 120 ms (Kawasaki et al., 2001).”
Understanding the Nature of Face Processing Impairment in Autism: Insights From Behavioral and Electrophysiological Studies (2005, background): “Differential ERPs to distinct facial expressions of emotion have been shown in infants as young as 7 months of age (Nelson & de Haan, 1996), in children (de Haan, Nelson, Gunnar, & Tout, 1998), and in adults (Eimer & Holmes, 2002).”
The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions (2005, methodology): “…expressions, (~ 120 ms), preceding even neural responses from ventral visual cortex relating to the structural encoding of faces (~ 170 ms) (e.g., Eimer & Holmes, 2002; Eimer, Holmes, & McGlone, 2003; Holmes, Vuilleumier, & Eimer, 2003; Kawasaki et al., 2001; for a review, see Vuilleumier, 2002).”
Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, background): “…2003; Schupp et al., 2000) or the facial expression was presented outside of focal vision with subjects instructed to fixate on a cross in the centre of a screen while one facial picture was presented simultaneously at each outer area of the left and right area of the screen (Eimer & Holmes, 2002).”
The discrimination of angry and fearful facial expressions in 7-month-old infants: An event-related potential study (2008, background): “In the adult work, no effect of expressions on the N170 was found (eg, Eimer & Holmes, 2002 ).”
Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study (2010, result): “Parallel to previous ERP studies of responses to affective stimuli (Eimer and Holmes, 2002; Fan and Han, 2008; Han et al., 2008; Schupp et al., 2000), a salient effect of the painful stimuli was detected in a broad time window from 120 ms to 400 ms: painful (needle) stimuli elicited stronger ERP amp”
Subcortical face processing (2005, background): “Converging evidence from EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) and MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHIC (MEG) studies shows that components associated with a 'fast pathway' for face processing can occur at much shorter latencies (less than 100 ms) than those that are generally associated with the 'structural encodin”