Size-dependent melting point depression of nanostructures: Nanocalorimetric measurements

By Ming Zhang, M. Efremov, F. Schiettekatte, E. Olson, A. T. Kwan, S. Lai, T. Wisleder, J. Greene, L. Allen. 2000

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fe24579774c9388891fb3450be216c96604bf01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. G. McKenna
2. Chang Q. Sun
3. M. Alcoutlabi

In Materials Chemistry

1. M. Alcoutlabi
2. G. McKenna
3. Chang Q. Sun
4. M. Wiesner
5. Matti Malinen
6. J. Sorvari

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Chang Q. Sun

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of confinement on material behaviour at the nanometre size scale (2005, background): “Although these models represent different proposed mechanisms of melting of the small particles, they predict essentially the same relationship as shown in equation (1), except that the surface tension of the liquid in contact with solid, σsl, is replaced by α which has been shown to differ slightly”
• Size dependence of nanostructures: Impact of bond order deficiency (2007, background): “Classical thermodynamic theories based on the surface Laplace and the GibbseDuhem equations [277] have derived that KC obeys the following relations [275,278]:”
• Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. (2009, background): “The melting point of indium and tin nanoparticles can be respectively reduced by 120 °C (ref”