The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. III. Optical and UV Spectra of a Blue Kilonova from Fast Polar Ejecta

By M. Nicholl, E. Berger, D. Kasen, B. Metzger, J. Elias, C. Briceño, K. Alexander, P. Blanchard, Ryan Chornock, P. Cowperthwaite and 24 more. 2017

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present optical and ultraviolet spectra of the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave (GW) source, the binary neutron star merger GW170817. Spectra were obtained nightly between 1.5 and 9.5 days post-merger, using the Southern Astrophysical Research and Magellan telescopes; the UV spectrum was obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope at 5.5 days. Our data reveal a rapidly fading blue component ( T ≈ 5500 K at 1.5 days) that quickly reddens; spectra later than ≳ 4.5 days peak beyond the optical regime. The spectra are mostly featureless, although we identify a possible weak emission line at ∼7900 Å at t ≲ 4.5 days. The colors, rapid evolution, and featureless spectrum are consistent with a “blue” kilonova from polar ejecta comprised mainly of light r-process nuclei with atomic mass number A ≲ 140 . This indicates a sightline within θ obs ≲ 45 ° of the orbital axis. Comparison to models suggests ∼0.03 M⊙ of blue ejecta, with a velocity of ∼ 0.3 c . The required lanthanide fraction is ∼ 10 − 4 , but this drops to < 10 − 5 in the outermost ejecta. The large velocities point to a dynamical origin, rather than a disk wind, for this blue component, suggesting that both binary constituents are neutron stars (as opposed to a binary consisting of a neutron star and a black hole). For dynamical ejecta, the high mass favors a small neutron star radius of ≲ 12 km. This mass also supports the idea that neutron star mergers are a major contributor to r-process nucleosynthesis.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fd8f250b2b7ec6fa3b73a2b61bfaa8c921e962d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. E. Berger
  3. Bing Zhang
  4. E. Quataert
  5. Michela Mapelli
  6. David Radice
  7. N. Giacobbo
  8. D. Kasen

Citations in the corpus