The Expressive Power of a Class of Normalizing Flow Models
By Zhifeng Kong, Kamalika Chaudhuri. 2020
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Normalizing flows have received a great deal of recent attention as they allow flexible generative modeling as well as easy likelihood computation. While a wide variety of flow models have been proposed, there is little formal understanding of the representation power of these models. In this work, we study some basic normalizing flows and rigorously establish bounds on their expressive power. Our results indicate that while these flows are highly expressive in one dimension, in higher dimensions their representation power may be limited, especially when the flows have moderate depth.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Generative Models, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Arash Vahdat
- Karsten Kreis
- Jan Kautz
- Zhisheng Xiao
- Rewon Child
- Lu Jiang
- Prafulla Dhariwal
- Alex Nichol
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Generative Models
- Arash Vahdat
- Karsten Kreis
- Jan Kautz
- Zhisheng Xiao
- Robin Rombach
- Jiaming Song
- Prafulla Dhariwal
- Patrick Esser
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
Citations in the corpus
- Score-based Generative Modeling in Latent Space (2021, background): “However, previous works found that augmenting neural ODEs [16, 17] and more generally generative models [18, 19, 20, 21] with latent variables improves their expressivity.”
- VAEBM: A Symbiosis between Variational Autoencoders and Energy-based Models (2020, background): “VAEs also do not suffer from expressivity limitations that normalizing flows face (Dupont et al., 2019; Kong & Chaudhuri, 2020), and in fact, they have recently shown state-of-the-art generative results among non-autoregressive likelihood-based models (Vahdat & Kautz, 2020).”