Large-Eddy Simulation of an Idealized Tropical Cyclone
By R. Rotunno, Yongsheng Chen, Wei Wang, Christopher A. Davis, Jimy Dudhia, G. Holland. 2009
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fbdede4297dfd672266d24bc3cc333c7db8a7e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of Surface Exchange Coefficients and Turbulence Length Scales on the Intensity and Structure of Numerically Simulated Hurricanes (2012, background): “…turbulence in hurricane boundary layers cannot be resolved in numerical models unless grid spacing is less than approximately 100 m (e.g., Rotunno et al. 2009); because such resolution is onerously expensive, the vast majority of modeling studies of hurricanes use turbulence…”
- Nested Mesoscale Large-Eddy Simulations with WRF: Performance in Real Test Cases (2012, background): “…landscape and land cover on atmospheric flows and land–atmosphere exchanges (Bou-Zeid et al. 2004; Talbot et al. 2007a; Courault et al. 2007; Chan 2009; Rotunno et al. 2009; Stoll and Porte´-Agel 2009; Bou-Zeid et al. 2009), as well as their influence on the transport of pollutants (Talbot et al.…”
- Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics (2012, unknown): “However, several studies have documented the sensitivity of deep convection simulations to horizontal grid spacing at scales below 1 km (e.g., Grabowski 1998; Adlerman and Droegemeier 2002; Petch and Gray 2001; Petch et al. 2002; Bryan et al. 2003; Rotunno et al. 2009; Dawson et al. 2010).”
- Analysis of tropical‐like cyclones over the Mediterranean Sea through a combined modeling and satellite approach (2013, background): “Considering that the simulated wind speed would be larger—and more realistic—by reducing the resolution to 1 km or less [Rotunno et al., 2009], it is reasonable to suppose that the most intense cyclones belong to Category 1.”