Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction
By L. Garamszegi. 2006
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fa78a1b15e73469b3322e87437db1c274894d03
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- L. Garamszegi
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- N. Dingemanse
- A. Møller
- H. Schielzeth
- N. Dochtermann
- A. Liker
- Marcel Eens
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- L. Garamszegi
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- N. Dingemanse
- Marcel Eens
- H. Schielzeth
- J. Török
- Roger Mundry
- T. Piersma
Citations in the corpus
- A method for exploring the structure of behavioural syndromes to allow formal comparison within and between data sets (2010, background): “While Bonferroni corrections are often considered overly conservative (Garcia 2004; Garamszegi 2006), correction is needed unless the results are to be considered purely exploratory.”
- Behavioural syndromes and trappability in free-living collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis (2009, methodology): “Garamszegi et al. / Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 803–812 804”
- Detrimental effects of recent ocean surface warming on growth condition of Atlantic salmon (2008, methodology): “…comparison studies of such large scale, there appears to be no general agreement on the most appropriate statistical method or conceptual strategy in protecting both Types 1 and 2 error rates by, for example, adjusting probabilities (Perneger, 1998; Garcı́a, 2004; Nakagawa, 2004; Garamszegi, 2006).”
- Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007, background): “We feel that it is the absence of accessible recommendations and systematic guidelines for effect size presentation, as much as an ignorance of the issues, which has hindered the spread of good statistical practice in the biological literature (e.g. Nakagawa, 2004; Nakagawa & Foster, 2004; Garamszeg”
- Risk taking by singing males (2008, background): “We also present 95% confidence intervals as suggested recently (Nakagawa 2004; Garamszegi 2006).”
- Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology (2009, background): “Accordingly, reporting effect sizes and their CIs has become a recommended practice in biology, although this recommendation has not permeated general statistical practices in behavioral ecology (Nakagawa 2004; Garamszegi 2006).”
- Dredging for edible cockles (Cerastoderma edule) on intertidal flats: short-term consequences of fisher patch-choice decisions for target and non-target benthic fauna (2007, background): “Because our estimates of shortterm dredging disturbance are conservative, because of the rough assignments of dredged and non-dredged sampling locations (see Dutch cockle-dredging practice), and because we did not perform a random search for correlations but rather evaluated species one by one, we b”
- Testosterone and melanin-based black plumage coloration: a comparative study (2008, methodology): “…Types I and II errors, we followed the recent recommendations of Nakagawa (2004) and preferred using effect sizes instead of Bonferroni correction for significance levels because the latter approach has been criticized for both mathematical and logical reasons (Nakagawa 2004; Garamszegi 2006).”