Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport‐radiation model

By Toshihiko Takemura, T. Nozawa, S. Emori, Takashi Nakajima, Teruyuki Nakajima. 2005

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fa0c467e5970c094ad4194b0bc63638b3aa0330

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Global indirect aerosol effects: a review (2004, neutral): “…Menon et al. (2002a); Quaas et al. (2004), of anthropogenic sulfate and black, and organic carbon (turquoise bars) from Lohmann and Lesins (2002); Takemura et al. (2005), from a combination of ECHAM4 GCM and POLDER satellite results (black bars) by Lohmann and Lesins (2002) and the mean plus…”
A Cumulus Parameterization with State-Dependent Entrainment Rate. Part I: Description and Sensitivity to Temperature and Humidity Profiles (2010, methodology): “5 of the Mellor–Yamada turbulence scheme (Mellor and Yamada 1982) revised by Nakanishi and Niino (2004), an orographic gravity wave drag, the land surface model Minimal Advanced Treatments of Surface Interaction and Runoff (MATSIRO), and prognostic aerosols with direct and indirect effects (Takemura”
Internally mixed soot, sulfates, and organic matter in aerosol particles from Mexico City (2008, background): “R Buseck: Internally mixed soot particles mixtures), mixtures of different materials (internal mixtures), or both (Jacobson, 2001; Chung and Seinfeld, 2002, 2005; Bond et al., 2006; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Takemura et al., 2005; Stier et al., 2007).”
Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom (2005, neutral): “…et al. (2001) bin, modal M for aerosol dyn ** 17 bins 10 DU, 4 SS, 1 BC, 1 BCPOM, 1 SO4 (5 modes for aerosol dyn) ext partly int for BC/ POM none Takemura et al. (2000, 2002, 2005) ); Guelle et al. (1998a, b, 2000); Smith and Harrison (1998); Balkanski et al. (2003); Bauer et al. (2004); Schulz…”
The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “Currently, NICAM is implemented with a global 3D aerosol transport-radiation model, the Spectral RadiationTransport Model for Aerosol Species (SPRINTARS) (described fully in Takemura et al. 2000, 2002, 2005, 2009; Goto et al. 2011a).”
Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect (2009, methodology): “In SPRINTARS [Takemura et al., 2005], a lower bound for the aerosol number concentration instead of for the CDNC is applied, and it is set to 300 cm 3 over land and to 30 cm 3 over ocean.”
Overview of the Atmospheric Brown Cloud East Asian Regional Experiment 2005 and a study of the aerosol direct radiative forcing in east Asia (2007, positive): “This overestimation of the scale height of the aerosol layer may lead to underestimation of ARF at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to a humidity effect and a reflectivity effect of underlying cloud layers as discussed by Haywood and Boucher [2000] and Takemura et al. [2005] .”
Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models (2014, background): “…of Climate System Research in the Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute at the University of Tokyo, the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan, and the Research Institute for Global Change in the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology [Takemura et al., 2005, 2009].”
Simulation of direct radiative forcing of aerosols and their effects on East Asian climate using an interactive AGCM-aerosol coupled system (2012, methodology): “0.32 W m-2 reported by Takemura et al. (2005) and ?”
Application of the CALIOP layer product to evaluate the vertical distribution of aerosols estimated by global models: AeroCom phase I results (2012, background): “Models have shown to best agree on the emission mass fluxes of “anthropogenic” compared with “natural”matter [Textor et al., 2006]. Results from Textor et al. [2006] show that differences in natural SS and DU aerosols are due to differences in the simulation of the size spectra, in the parameterizat”