An alternative truly-mixed formulation to solve pressure load problems in topology optimization
By Matteo Bruggi, C. Cinquini. 2009
62 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f9c572c6477a2c55e12188ebef072a7f0d1330c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- W. Vicente
- Ramana V. Grandhi
- R. Pavanello
- Joshua D. Deaton
- Renato Picelli
- Liang Xia
- Matthijs Langelaar
- Ole Sigmund
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- W. Vicente
- Ramana V. Grandhi
- R. Pavanello
- Joshua D. Deaton
- Renato Picelli
- Liang Xia
- Matthijs Langelaar
- Ole Sigmund
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization for design-dependent fluid pressure loading problems (2015, background): “The mixed finite element models of Sigmund and Clausen (2007) and Bruggi and Cinquini (2009) treat the problem slightly differently, and the fluid volume should be constrained in order to avoid the formation of fluid cavities.”
- A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 (2014, methodology): “A similar approach was presented by Bruggi and Cinquini (2009).”
- Stress-constrained topology optimization with design-dependent loading (2012, unknown): “Some authors use a multiphase approach to identify the material, void, and fluid regions (Bourdin and Chambolle 2003; Bruggi and Cinquini 2009; Sigmund and Clausen 2007).”