Integrating marker-assisted selection in crop breeding: Prospects and challenges
By R. Babu, S. Nair, Boddupalli M. Prasanna, H. Gupta. 2004
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f9674c72bd48d58455052518d18abce562d9cec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Principles, requirements and prospects of genetic mapping in plants (2006, unknown): “J. Biotechnol. ted at least for six generations, more than 99% of the genome from BC6 and above will be derived from recurrent parent (Babu et al., 2004).”
- Progress and prospects of marker assisted backcrossing as a tool in crop breeding programs (2006, background): “Traditional backcrossing programs are planned on the assumption that the proportion of the recurrent parent genome is recovered at a rate of 1 – (1/2)t+1 for each of t generations of backcrossing (Babu et al., 2004).”
- Molecular Markers and Marker-Assisted Breeding in Plants (2013, background): “A favorable genetic map should have an adequate number of evenly-spaced polymorphic markers to accurately locate desired QTLs/genes (Babu et al., 2004). d. Knowledge of marker-trait association: The most crucial factor for marker-assisted breeding is the knowledge of the associations between markers”
- Development of a multiplex PCR method for simultaneous detection of diagnostic DNA markers of five disease and pest resistance genes in potato (2011, unknown): “MAS can identify rapidly and reliably resistant genotypes, becoming an important and practical breeding tool ( Babu et al. 2004; Xu and Crouch 2008).”