A Theoretical Study on Solving Continual Learning
By Gyuhak Kim, Changnan Xiao, Tatsuya Konishi, Zixuan Ke, Bin Liu. 2022
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Continual learning (CL) learns a sequence of tasks incrementally. There are two popular CL settings, class incremental learning (CIL) and task incremental learning (TIL). A major challenge of CL is catastrophic forgetting (CF). While a number of techniques are already available to effectively overcome CF for TIL, CIL remains to be highly challenging. So far, little theoretical study has been done to provide a principled guidance on how to solve the CIL problem. This paper performs such a study. It first shows that probabilistically, the CIL problem can be decomposed into two sub-problems: Within-task Prediction (WP) and Task-id Prediction (TP). It further proves that TP is correlated with out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, which connects CIL and OOD detection. The key conclusion of this study is that regardless of whether WP and TP or OOD detection are defined explicitly or implicitly by a CIL algorithm, good WP and good TP or OOD detection are necessary and sufficient for good CIL performances. Additionally, TIL is simply WP. Based on the theoretical result, new CIL methods are also designed, which outperform strong baselines in both CIL and TIL settings by a large margin.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Meta & Continual Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Meta & Continual Learning
Citations in the corpus
- A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Application (2023, background): “This is closely related to the out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where the predictive uncertainty should be low for in-distribution data and high for OOD data [74], [75], [76], [77].”
- Learnability and Algorithm for Continual Learning (2023, methodology): “However, (Kim et al., 2022b) does not prove that CIL is learnable.”
- Deep Class-Incremental Learning: A Survey (2023, background): “[247] theoretically decomposes the CIL problem into within-task and task-id predictions.”
- Class-Incremental Learning: A Survey (2023, methodology): “[ 235] theoretically decomposes the CIL problem into within-task and task-id predictions.”
- Continual Pre-training of Language Models (2023, background): “…or without continual learning) (Mitchell et al., 2022) that corrects mistakes learned in the LM is a special case of continual end-task learning (Kim et al., 2022) as each editing task or a group of editing tasks learned together is basically a task in continual learning, which aims to perform…”