Aqueous extraction of proteins from microalgae: Effect of different cell disruption methods
By C. Safi, A. Ursu, C. Laroche, Bachar Zebib, O. Merah, P. Pontalier, C. Vaca-Garcia. 2014
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f8a5f32a63dcf3cd7d8ddfdf0073f0753f9ecca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Mild cell disruption methods for bio-functional proteins recovery from microalgae—Recent developments and future perspectives (2017, background): “energy shattering the rigid cell wall and releasing the desired intracellular compounds into the solution [34,42].”
- Understanding the effect of cell disruption methods on the diffusion of Chlorella vulgaris proteins and pigments in the aqueous phase (2015, background): “vulgaris, such as bead milling [19], ultrasonication [20], lysing buffer [21], high-pressure homogenization [22], microwaves [23], enzymatic treatment [24] and surfactants [25] in order to free internal components, such as lipids or proteins [26].”
- Root morphological and molecular responses induced by microalgae extracts in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) (2018, background): “Among them, Chlorella vulgaris attracts the attention of scientists for its high protein content, reaching > 55% of biomass dry weight (Safi et al. 2014).”