Efficient silicon solar cells with dopant-free asymmetric heterocontacts

By J. Bullock, M. Hettick, J. Geissbühler, Alison J. Ong, T. Allen, C. Sutter‐Fella, Teresa L. Chen, H. Ota, E. Schaler, S. de Wolf and 3 more. Nature Energy, 2016

519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f7f589ca224f26c51c140d9e2d6d9624c4bd389

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. L. Black
2. W. Kessels

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. B. Rech
2. M. Mews
3. B. Macco
4. L. Korte
5. Jimmy Melskens
6. L. Black
7. S. Smit
8. W. Kessels

Citations in the corpus

• Oxygen vacancies in tungsten oxide and their influence on tungsten oxide/silicon heterojunction solar cells (2016, background): “4 % efficiency with a lithium floride electron contact and a molybdenum oxide hole contact deposited on (i)a-Si:H passivation layers [14].”
• Passivating Contacts for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells: From Concepts and Materials to Prospects (2018, methodology): “2–76 mΩ·cm2 [15], [106], [133]–[137]), while just a single report of a low J0 value has appeared, it is likely that J0 is generally more of a limiting factor in the solar cell performance than ρcontact for these materials.”