Do key audit matters impact financial reporting behavior?

By Anna Keller Gold, Melina Heilmann, Christiane Pott, Johanna Rematzki. International Journal of Auditing, 2020

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This study experimentally examines whether the implementation of key audit matters (KAMs) in auditors' reports affects managers' reporting behavior. In line with prior research in psychology, we argue that greater transparency through KAMs leads to higher accountability pressure as managers may expect their judgments to be scrutinized more strongly in the presence of KAMs and, hence, to an improvement of financial reporting quality. Further, we examine whether informational precision (firm-specific versus nonfirm-specific information) in a KAM section moderates the effect of KAM presence on reporting behavior. Our findings show that managers' tendency to make an aggressive financial reporting decision is reduced in the presence of KAMs (compared to the absence of KAMs). This effect remains even when the description of the KAM is of low informational precision. Thus, our results suggest that KAMs serve as a beneficial mechanism for enhancing financial reporting quality by attenuating aggressive financial reporting behavior, regardless of the precision employed by auditors.

Subfields: Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f7ded30246a0650e863f1a88468fa3d665506ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Jochen C. Theis
  2. Nicole V. S. Ratzinger‐Sakel
  3. Annette G. Köhler

Citations in the corpus