Duality in climate science
By Kevin Anderson. 2015
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f66778d2bdb67b9f18769d1579a47ec729b6c29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Jason Hickel
- S. Wynes
- Kimberly A. Nicholas
- J. Kuriakose
- A. Larkin
- Maria Sharmina
- Duncan P McLaren
- M. Callaghan
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jason Hickel
- Pete Smith
- Felix Creutzig
- M. Callaghan
- Sabine Fuss
- S. Wynes
- Kimberly A. Nicholas
- J. Minx
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Fast growing research on negative emissions (2017, background): “This kicked-off a controversial debate that focused on the feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways that involve large amounts of NETs (Fuss et al 2014, Anderson 2015, Geden 2015, Vaughan and Gough 2016).”
- Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver (2016, background): “…in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels’ (United Nations 2015), closer scrutiny of the feasibility of BECCS becomes increasingly pertinent (Anderson 2015a).”
- What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations (2018, background): “to leave a CO2-only budget for energy and industry from 2015 to 2100: >50%, 898 GtCO2; >66%, 798 GtCO2, consistent with Rogelj, Schaeffer, et al. (2016). Whilst a next step could allocate shares”
- Reply to Second comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’ (2017, background): “This has prompted calls (Anderson 2015) for near-term, profound emissions cuts that may require changes in lifestyle choices from the high-carbon individuals estimated to produce nearly 50% of emissions (Gore 2015).”
- The Wellbeing–Consumption paradox: Happiness, health, income, and carbon emissions in growing versus non-growing economies (2019, background): “This 12-fold 486 increase in economic activity would take place over a period when global carbon emissions already 487 need to decline by ~10% per year for a likely chance to meet the 2 °C target without negative 488 emissions technologies (Anderson, 2015).”
- Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “…further elevated the issue and emphasized the controversial nature of NETs deployments featured in long-term mitigation scenarios (Geden 2015, Anderson 2015, Anderson and Peters 2016, Gasser et al 2015, Peters and Geden 2017, Lomax et al 2015, Williamson 2016, Parson 2017, Field and Mach…”
- Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis (2018, background): “…both the scenario literature where BECCS studies initially gained prominence, as well more general discussions of negative emissions where scenarios are often used as a starting point (Smith et al 2016, Anderson 2015, Anderson and Peters 2016, Fuss et al 2014, 2016, Gasser et al 2015, Geden 2015).”
- A Green New Deal without growth? (2021, background): “All the models projecting that climate stabilization can be achieved while global GDP grows at the normal rate of 2–3% per year rely heavily on negative emissions technologies that are unproven at scale (Anderson, 2015).”
- The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions (2018, background): “This has prompted calls (Anderson 2015) for near-term, profound emissions cuts that may require changes in lifestyle choices from the high-carbon individuals estimated to produce nearly 50% of emissions (Gore 2015).”
- Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5 °C-compliant global mitigation effort (2017, background): “While much can be said about the uncertainties and value judgements involved in such pathways and scenarios (e.g. Anderson 2015; Shue 2017; Faran and Olsson 2017, in this special issue), these are often secondary in scientific debates.”
- Towards a cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence by negative emissions technologies (NETs) (2018, background): “This has helped sustain high-level policy conclusions (most recently in Paris [10]) that climate targets can be met through a managed transition based on energy efficiency, low-carbon energy technologies and NETs, without abrupt and (politically and economically) disruptive transformations in energy”