Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part I: modeling

By Patrick R. Onck, E. W. Andrews, L. Gibson. 2001

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling (2018, neutral): “4 have a sufficient number of cells, which avoid sample size effect [89-91], and thus they are representative for the measurement of macroscopic mechanical properties.”
Compressive properties of 3D printed auxetic structures: experimental and numerical studies (2020, methodology): “Several methods were proposed to determine the 1cd (Chan and Xie 2003; Vural and Ravichandran 2003; Onck, Andrews, and Gibson 2001).”
Computational homogenization of cellular materials (2014, background): “[2], and of the localization phenomena due to micro–buckling of thin components (cell walls, cell struts), as discussed for example by Papka et al.”
Elasto-static micropolar behavior of a chiral auxetic lattice (2012, background): “With the exception of Onck et al. (2001), no connection between microstructure type and specific behavior is provided and the general contribution of the lattice parameter (or average cell size for stochastic configurations) and length scale l c are discussed.”