Seeing subjectivity: defending a perceptual account of other minds

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how (2016, background): “…can take different shapes: reflecting and describing should not be seen as a falsification of originary or pre-reflective 5 See Krueger 2014 and Krueger and Overgaard 2012. experience, but should be considered as an opening up of it (Zahavi 1999, 181–9; 2005, 89–96; 2011a) The descriptions we…”
Seeing mind in action (2012, background): “See Krueger and Overgaard (2011) for a much longer discussion of and response to this and several related objections.”
The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (2017, background): “…so let me here merely point out that the notion of social perception has gained popularity and been defended by philosophers coming from a variety of different traditions in recent years (cf. Rudd Green 2007, Cassam 2007, Newen & Schlicht 2009, Smith 2010, Stout 2010, Krueger & Overgaard 2012).”
Social Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions (2014, background): “Moreover, one can argue in favor of the direct perception thesis in several ways (Smith 2010; McNeill 2012; Krueger and Overgaard 2012) but”