Modelling and Measuring the Effect of Public Subsidies on Business R&D: A Critical Review of the Econometric Literature

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The "Matthew Effect" in R&D Public Subsidies: the Italian Evidence (2013, unknown): “Several econometric methods have been developed in order to get reliable results in the presence of such selection bias (Cerulli, 2010).”
Value for Money? New Microeconometric Evidence on Public R&D Grants in Flanders (2012, background): “For a more comprehensive survey of most recent studies, see Cerulli (2010).”
Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany (2014, background): “In the more recent empirical findings (including the one mentioned here above), authors did generally not find evidence of crowding-out effects (see also Cerulli 2010, for a recent survey).”
Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?* (2016, unknown): “In a recent study on Swiss firms, Arvanitis, Donze, 3 See Czarnitzki and Lopes-Bento (2013) for an overview on relevant recent empirical studies; and Cerulli (2010) for a critical overview on the different applied methods.”