IUCN Red List assessment and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: taxonomists must act now

By M. Callmander, G. Schatz, P. P. Lowry II. 2005

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f01b51186a29216d8a5a469043618684b5a5f31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. J. Vié
2. C. Hilton‐Taylor
3. Simon N. Stuart
4. T. Consiglio
5. M. Callmander

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Hilton‐Taylor
2. J. Vié
3. Simon N. Stuart
4. M. Callmander
5. P. P. Lowry II
6. Michel O. Laivao
7. T. Consiglio
8. Tantely Raminosoa

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Simon N. Stuart
2. C. Hilton‐Taylor
3. J. Vié
4. T. Consiglio
5. M. Callmander

Citations in the corpus

• Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species (2009, methodology): “The IUCN Red List is also an important tool for implementing some elements of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation adopted by the CBD in 2002, for example, Target 2 which calls for a preliminary assessment of all plant species and Target 7 aiming at conserving 60 per cent of the world’s threat”
• Identification of priority areas for plant conservation in Madagascar using Red List criteria: rare and threatened Pandanaceae indicate sites in need of protection (2007, background): “We have argued elsewhere (Callmander et al., 2005) that the data deficient (DD) category should be used with parsimony to avoid underestimating the number of threatened species; this approach has been followed here.”