Biological individuality: the case of biofilms
By Marc Ereshefsky, Makmiller Martins Pedroso. Biology & Philosophy, 2012
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ef1e042e9f42ff483eab5fc2b3b914a3df18bb1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “Biofilms, just like organisms, have their own distinctive life cycles (Ereshefsky and Pedroso 2013).”
- Everything Flows : Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “Biofilms, just like organisms, have their own distinctive life cycles (Ereshefsky and Pedroso 2013).”
- Holobionts and the ecology of organisms: Multi-species communities or integrated individuals? (2016, background): “Ereshefsky and Pedroso (2013, 2015) use biofilms as a case study to defend the position that multi-species consortiums can be units of selection.”