Host–parasitoid population dynamics

By M. Hassell. 2000

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ee2ed0b9aadbff124c3b92a6a31ea10f5c4e94c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. Wratten
2. B. Lavandero
3. M. Jervis
4. Atte Moilanen
5. M. Nieminen
6. V. Brown
7. P. Amarasekare
8. M. Shaw

In Genetics

1. Atte Moilanen
2. M. Jervis
3. M. Nieminen
4. P. Amarasekare
5. M. Shaw
6. A. Gange

In Insect Science

1. S. Wratten
2. B. Lavandero
3. M. Jervis
4. Atte Moilanen
5. Teresa Newton
6. M. Nieminen
7. P. Amarasekare
8. M. Shaw

Citations in the corpus

• Fish movement and habitat use depends on water body size and shape (2009, background): “Within home ranges, fish encounter different types and numbers of other organisms including competitors (e.g. invasive species), predators (e.g. other fish or birds), parasites (e.g. freshwater mussel glochidia) and disease organisms (Hassell 2000, Chase et al. 2002).”
• Ecological and genetic interactions in Drosophila-parasitoids communities: a case study with D. melanogaster, D. simulans and their common Leptopilina parasitoids in south-eastern France. (2004, background): “Thus, they behave as powerful biocontrol agents and have stimulated extensive research in population dy­ namics (Murdoch & Briggs, 1996; Hassell, 2000 ), behavioral ecology (review in Godfray, 1994; Godfray & Shimada, 1999) and evolutionary biology, par­ ticularly co-evolutionary dynamics of host r”
• The need for effective marking and tracking techniques for monitoring the movements of insect predators and parasitoids (2004, background): “The data thus gained can be used to show that the dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions are influenced by local population spatial patchiness, by interactions with other species and by metapopulation structure (Hassell, 2000).”
• Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis (2003, background): “Investigations of parasitoid guilds also have practical applications in biological control because whether or not parasitoid natural enemies coexist via spatial processes is likely to have important consequences for pest population abundance and variability ( Hassell 2000; Bogran et al. 2002).”
• Chalcid parasitoid community associated with the invading pest Dryocosmus kuriphilus in north‐western Italy (2013, background): “…use of the abundant D. kuriphilus could in turn lead to increased levels of parasitism imposed upon native oak gallers, potentially driving their populations locally extinct (Hassel, 2000) or inducing severe perturbations in the functioning of native communities (Henneman & Memmott, 2001).”
• Habitat Considerations for Parasitic Wasps (Hymenoptera) (2006, background): “Similar analyses of long time-series data on host/parasitoid systems have confirmed that heterogeneity within populations (such that not all individuals are equally susceptible, cf. Hassell 2000 ) can underlie empirical cases of coexistence that contradict simplistic ecological models (e.g., Bonsal”
• Multitrophic links between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and insect parasitoids (2003, background): “( Hassell 2000 ). While not explicitly tested for in this study, there appeared to be little”
• SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY (2002, background): “…rate occupancy, colonization abundance spatial synchrony model parameter Marsh et al. (1999) van Nouhuys and Hanski (1999) Moilanen (2000) Hassell (2000) A I t, I t, I F F F F NN IFM IFM NN2 s s nt nt habitat use colonization, occupancy model parameter model parameter Bond et al. (2000)…”