Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design

By Mariya Popova, Olexandr Isayev, Alexander Tropsha. 2017

1,235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We introduce an artificial intelligence approach to de novo design of molecules with desired physical or biological properties. We have devised and implemented a novel computational strategy for de novo design of molecules with desired properties termed ReLeaSE (Reinforcement Learning for Structural Evolution). On the basis of deep and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, ReLeaSE integrates two deep neural networks—generative and predictive—that are trained separately but are used jointly to generate novel targeted chemical libraries. ReLeaSE uses simple representation of molecules by their simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) strings only. Generative models are trained with a stack-augmented memory network to produce chemically feasible SMILES strings, and predictive models are derived to forecast the desired properties of the de novo–generated compounds. In the first phase of the method, generative and predictive models are trained separately with a supervised learning algorithm. In the second phase, both models are trained jointly with the RL approach to bias the generation of new chemical structures toward those with the desired physical and/or biological properties. In the proof-of-concept study, we have used the ReLeaSE method to design chemical libraries with a bias toward structural complexity or toward compounds with maximal, minimal, or specific range of physical properties, such as melting point or hydrophobicity, or toward compounds with inhibitory activity against Janus protein kinase 2. The approach proposed herein can find a general use for generating targeted chemical libraries of novel compounds optimized for either a single desired property or multiple properties.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Gisbert Schneider
  2. Francesca Grisoni
  3. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  4. José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
  5. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  6. Regina Barzilay
  7. Sergey I. Nikolenko
  8. Philippe Schwaller

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  2. Gisbert Schneider
  3. Regina Barzilay
  4. Francesca Grisoni
  5. Frank No'e
  6. Wengong Jin
  7. José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
  8. Alán Aspuru-Guzik

In Molecular Biology

  1. Frank No'e
  2. Gisbert Schneider
  3. Cecilia Clementi
  4. Kyle Swanson
  5. Francesca Grisoni
  6. K. Müller
  7. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  8. Regina Barzilay

Citations in the corpus