Penalties from in-band crosstalk for advanced optical modulation formats

By Peter J. Winzer, Alan H. Gnauck, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy. 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication, 2011

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ed7b1a37aff95c19c4b8c8d1357cedf853d3269

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. David T. Neilson
2. G. Saridis
3. D. Simeonidou
4. G. Zervas
5. D. Alexandropoulos
6. Peter J. Winzer
7. René-Jean Essiambre
8. Joseph M. Kahn

Citations in the corpus

• From Scaling Disparities to Integrated Parallelism: A Decathlon for a Decade (2017, background): “would want to use on capacity-optimized links [89].”
• Survey and Evaluation of Space Division Multiplexing: From Technologies to Optical Networks (2015, background): “The threshold, beyond of which the signal integrity is altered, can vary between −18 dB and −32 dB, depending in the modulation format that is used [134].”
• High-Spectral-Efficiency Optical Modulation Formats (2012, background): “as the signal, and squares represent a substantially dispersed interferer (see [110] for details).”