Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks
By Georgios Papoudakis, Filippos Christianos, Lukas Schäfer, Stefano V. Albrecht. 2020
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria, making comparisons between approaches difficult. In this work, we provide a systematic evaluation and comparison of three different classes of MARL algorithms (independent learning, centralised multi-agent policy gradient, value decomposition) in a diverse range of cooperative multi-agent learning tasks. Our experiments serve as a reference for the expected performance of algorithms across different learning tasks, and we provide insights regarding the effectiveness of different learning approaches. We open-source EPyMARL, which extends the PyMARL codebase to include additional algorithms and allow for flexible configuration of algorithm implementation details such as parameter sharing. Finally, we open-source two environments for multi-agent research which focus on coordination under sparse rewards.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Reinforcement Learning, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Science Applications
In Reinforcement Learning
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
Citations in the corpus
- The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative Multi-Agent Games (2021, methodology): “[25] perform a broad benchmark of various MARL algorithms and note that PPO-based methods often perform competitively to other methods.”
- A survey of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with communication (2022, neutral): “These settings can make it challenging to fairly compare the relative strengths and limitations of algorithms based on their performance outcomes [111].”