Sound Detection Mechanisms and Capabilities of Teleost Fishes

By A. Popper, R. Fay, C. Platt, O. Sand. 2003

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ec998454ce5944eba97ce394f7567f57a82daa0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Diversity in Fish Auditory Systems: One of the Riddles of Sensory Biology (2016, background): “Some teleost taxa with accessory auditory structures such as mormyrids (Popper, 1981), otophysans (e.g., Popper and Platt, 1983), and the cichlid E. maculatus (Schulz-Mirbach et al., 2014) possess a large macula lagenae that may be even larger than the maculae sacculi (Popper et al., 2003).”
A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “…sound sources www.dosits.org; Urick, 1983 Part 2: Fish and invertebrate hearing and sound communication Tavolga, 1971; Hawkins and Myrberg, 1983; Popper et al., 2001, 2003; Webb et al., 2008; Ladich and Fay, 2013; Ladich, 2014 Part 3: Assessing effects Normandeau, 2012a; b; Hawkins and Popper,…”
The effects of aquaculture production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (2009, background): “Many teleost species, such as carp and catfish possess physiological adaptations called Weberian ossicles, a bony connection that bridges the swim bladder and the inner ear that enhances hearing capability (Popper and Fay, 1973; Popper et al., 2003; Ladich and Popper, 2004).”
Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies (2004, background): “Fish can detect sound levels from 50–75 dB at frequencies between 100 and 2000 Hz (Popper et al., 2002), but are generally insensitive to frequencies over 2 to 3 kHz (except clupeids, Mann et al., 1997).”
Using at-sea experiments to study the effects of airguns on the foraging behavior of sperm whales in the Gulf of Mexico (2009, background): “Though the squid and fish species tested to date are different from the primary prey of sperm whales in the Gulf of Mexico, all squid and fish for which hearing has been measured have acute hearing in the frequency range of air gun pulses (Packard et al., 1990, Popper et al., 2003).”
Hearing in fish and their reactions to sounds from offshore wind farms (2005, background): “In addition to communication, passive listening may be used to detect predators and prey, and for orientation purposes (Popper & Fay 1993, Fay & Popper 2000, Popper et al. 2003), and some fish may even use sound as a primitive form of echo location (Tavolga 1971).”
A review of impacts of marine dredging activities on marine mammals (2015, background): “Extensive variability exists between hearing sensitivity of fish species, but in general, they are sensitive to low frequencies (Popper et al., 2003; Popper and Fay, 2011), which puts them at risk from dredging noise.”
Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology (2005, background): “The questions posed about otoliths by fisheries biologists and neuroscientists may appear to be quite different, but when analysed in detail, they are often similar questions taken from different perspectives.”
Otolith research and application: current directions in innovation and implementation (2005, methodology): “Otoliths or ‘ear bones’ are small calcified structures found in the heads of fish, which assist in detecting sound and are used for balance and orientation (Campana and Neilson 1985; Popper et al. 2003).”
Otolith Biochemistry—A Review (2019, background): “It accomplishes this through the shearing force produced as an individual otolith oscillates against the macular cilia (Popper et al., 2003).”