Evaluations of Molecular Docking Programs for Virtual Screening

By K. Onodera, K. Satou, H. Hirota. 2007

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Software for molecular docking: a review (2017, background): “The sizes of the binding sites for the complexes that were successfully solved only by GOLD were widely distributed, from 2253 to 7900 Å, and represented the various protein types (Onodera et al. 2007).”
Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go (2008, result): “While this manuscript was under revision, other comparative studies were published (McGaughey et al ., 2007; Onodera et al ., 2007; Zhou et al ., 2007) and are included in Table 3 but are not discussed.”
Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy (2009, background): “23 However, combining the results of these evaluations to form a coherent assessment of a docking program can be difﬁcult, since unique data sets and different data analysis methods are often employed.”