Cross-Country Heterogeneity in Intertemporal Substitution

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimal Financial Knowledge and Wealth Inequality (2017, unknown): “The choice of w is guided by a meta-analysis by Havranek et al. (2015) reporting a mean value of 0.”
Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics (2017, methodology): “Havranek et al. (2015) use BMA in a meta-analysis of intertemporal substitution in consumption.”
MEASURING INTERTEMPORAL SUBSTITUTION: THE IMPORTANCE OF METHOD CHOICES AND SELECTIVE REPORTING (2015, methodology): “In Havranek et al. (2013) we examine the cross-country heterogeneity in the estimates of the EIS.”
Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias (2020, background): “Andrews & Kasy (2019) use the observation reported by many researchers (for instance, Havranek, 2015; Brodeur et al., 2016) that standard cut-offs for the p-value (0.01, 0.05, 0.1) are associated with jumps in the distribution of reported estimates.”
Habit Formation in Consumption: A Meta-Analysis (2017, background): “Havranek et al. (2015) find substantial cross-country heterogeneity in the elasticity of intertemporal substitution in consumption associated with cross-country differences in income and stock market participation.”
Are Low Real Interest Rates Here to Stay (2017, background): “Estimates of these parameters are difficult to obtain, but one meta-study by Havranek et al. (2015) suggests that the global average for σ (household preferences for smoothed consumption) could be around 0.5.”