Fragmented but not isolated: Contribution of single trees, small patches and long-distance pollen flow to genetic connectivity for Gomortega keule, an endangered Chilean tree

By T. Lander, D. Boshier, S. Harris. 2010

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e510a93bb470576f33fd37634c417da703b6525

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Danilo Boscolo
2. B. Viana
3. A. Lopes

In Genetics

1. B. Viana

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Danilo Boscolo

Citations in the corpus

• What do we know about the effects of landscape changes on plant–pollinator interaction networks? (2013, unknown): “…by reducing the abundance and diversity of pollinators (Steffan-Dewenter and Tscharntke, 1999; Kremen et al., 2002; Chacoff and Aizen, 2006; Fujimori et al., 2006), which leads to lower seed production (Brudvig et al., 2009; Nazareno and Carvalho, 2009; Lander et al., 2010; Vesk et al., 2010).”
• How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services (2012, background): “In addition to the extent of natural environments, several authors indicate that the distance between patches has been one of the primary factors to affect the long-term maintenance of many species (Wiens 1995; Lennartson 2002; Smith & Hellmann 2002, Lander et al. 2010).”