Adiabatic time-dependent density functional methods for excited state properties

1,983 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

QUESTDB: A database of highly accurate excitation energies for the electronic structure community (2020, methodology): “In the same vein, as evoked above, we have also produced chemically-accurate theoretical 0-0 energies [86–88] which can be more straightforwardly compared to experimental data [83–85, 89–92, 99–101].”
Going beyond the vertical approximation with time‐dependent density functional theory (2016, methodology): “We follow previous works for describing 0–0 energies.(14,22,23) First, one can determine two vertical transition energies: the vertical absorption and emission energies.”
GW method and Bethe–Salpeter equation for calculating electronic excitations (2016, methodology): “In quantum chemistry methods like TDDFT, CIS, and EOM-CCSD, excited-state force can be calculated analytically.(115,116) Within the GW + BSE scheme, analytical excited-state forces are still unavailable.”
Tuned range-separated hybrids in density functional theory. (2010, neutral): “The KS equations (Equation 13) using the LDA functionals are −(1) 2 ∇2φ j (r) + ( v (r) + vH (r) + v S,LDA X (n (r)) + v S,LDA C (n (r)) ) φ j (r) = ε j φ j (r) , (21)”