Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning

By Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, John Preskill. Physical Review Letters, 2021

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend on an input parameter x and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum process E. Our figure of merit is the number of runs of E required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome after each run of E, and quantum ML models that can access E coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data are then used to predict the outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any input distribution D(x), a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing E a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for achieving an accurate prediction on all inputs, we prove that the exponential quantum advantage is possible. For example, to predict the expectations of all Pauli observables in an n-qubit system ρ, classical ML models require 2^{Ω(n)} copies of ρ, but we present a quantum ML model using only O(n) copies. Our results clarify where the quantum advantage is possible and highlight the potential for classical ML models to address challenging quantum problems in physics and chemistry.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e48731281c2af1fccc190ac2c9ca619e3101b21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. M. Cerezo
  2. Patrick J. Coles
  3. Lukasz Cincio
  4. Hsin-Yuan Huang
  5. Guillaume Verdon
  6. Martín Larocca
  7. Piotr Czarnik
  8. Jarrod R. McClean

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Lukasz Cincio
  2. M. Cerezo
  3. Patrick J. Coles
  4. Guillaume Verdon
  5. Hsin-Yuan Huang

Citations in the corpus