On the falsifiability of the nested clade phylogeographic analysis method

By R. Petit. 2008

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Phylogeography: its development and impact in Australo-Papuan ornithology with special reference to paraphyly in Australian birds (2009, background): “Petit (2008a) argued that NCA is fatally flawed in generating false-positive results at unacceptable rates and more debate predictably ensued (Garrick et al. 2008a; Knowles 2008; Petit 2008b; Templeton 2008).”
Incongruent patterns of genetic connectivity among four ophiuroid species with differing coral host specificity on North Atlantic seamounts (2010, methodology): “…debate over the effectiveness of nested clade approaches, including the high frequency of false positives (Panchal and Beaumont 2007; Petit 2008a; Petit 2008b), when used as part of a “battery of analyses” to validate its results (Garrick et al. 2008), it can be a practical and appropriate…”