Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture.

By Keil J. Regehr, Maribella Domenech, Justin T. Koepsel, Kristopher C. Carver, S. Ellison-Zelski, William L. Murphy, L. Schuler, E. Alarid, David J. Beebe. Lab on a Chip, 2009

693 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e2b6956b9db90436af07557a2f5b073aecab82f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Rafael Gómez-Sjöberg
2. Ronan M. T. Fleming
3. Mario Iodice
4. Giuseppe Coppola
5. Skarphedinn Halldorsson
6. B. Corrado
7. E. Lucumi
8. Stefania Torino

Citations in the corpus

• PDMS-Based Microfluidic Devices for Cell Culture (2018, background): “However, some works have shown how some uncross-linked monomers may move from the polymer to the medium and interact with hydrophobic parts of the cell membrane [70].”
• Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. (2015, methodology): “…microfluidic channel for 24 h and analyzed with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-offlight mass spectrometry, a continuous range of uncrosslinked PDMS was detected despite efforts to extract uncrosslinked PDMS with ethanol in a Soxhlet extractor overnight (Regehr et al., 2009).”