High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams

By K. Dannemann, J. Lankford. 2000

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e20d6639ce13595f90141af90b299e1d762d96d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. V. Deshpande
2. Norman A. Fleck
3. J. Harrigan
4. S. Reid
5. Jilin Yu
6. Zhijun Zheng
7. Han Zhao
8. I. Elnasri

In Mechanical Engineering

1. V. Deshpande
2. Norman A. Fleck
3. D. Radford
4. G. McShane
5. Jilin Yu
6. Zhijun Zheng
7. J. Harrigan
8. A. Heaver

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. Jilin Yu
2. Zhijun Zheng
3. V. Deshpande
4. Norman A. Fleck
5. J. Harrigan
6. D. Radford
7. Yaodong Liu
8. Jianrong Li

Citations in the corpus

• The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading (2006, methodology): “While the Alporas metal foam has a small strain rate sensitivity (Dannemann and Lankford, 2000; Miyoshi et al., 2002), shock wave propagation in these foams becomes important at impact velocities exceeding about 50 ms 1 (Radford et al., 2005). The algorithm employed in the finite element simulations”
• An underwater shock simulator (2006, background): “Numerous experimental studies have shown that the Alporas metal foam has a negligible strain-rate sensitivity ( Dannemann & Lankford 2000; Miyoshi et al. 2002), and that shock wave propagation in these foams becomes very important for impact velocities exceeding about 50 m sK1 (Radford et al. 2005)”
• Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: Part I Experiments (2007, background): “Dannemann & Lankford (2000) also reported rate sensitive results for Alporas foam.”
• Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling (2018, unknown): “Subsequently, many researchers believed that the pressurisation of the internal gas enclosed by the cells of a cellular material can give rise to a strain-rate hardening [29, 141, 143, 211].”
• Dynamic stress–strain states for metal foams using a 3D cellular model (2014, methodology): “For example, the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) has been used for cellular materials to investigate ‘strain-rate effects’ as for solids (Kolsky, 1949). However, this method requires/assumes uniform deformation throughout the specimen. Because of the localised nature of the dynamic deformation m”
• A numerical study on the rate sensitivity of cellular metals (2009, methodology): “…ALPORASTM Al, (Ca, Ti, Fe) 0.106/0.155 Batch casting sensitive Mukai et al. (2006) ALPORASTM Al, (Ca, Ti, Fe) 0.074/ 0.15 Batch casting sensitive Dannemann and Lankford (2000) ALULIGHT Al, (Mn, Si) 0.16–0.31 Powder metallurgy Insensitive Deshpande and Fleck (2000) SCHUNK Al, ðCaO2Þ 0.07–0.28…”
• Polypropylene foam behaviour under dynamic loadings : Strain rate, density and microstructure effects (2009, unknown): “The engineering stress s ¼ F / S 0 and true strain e ¼ ln ( 1 þ D l / l 0 ) have been chosen to represent the foam behaviour for two principal reasons: concerning the stress for this material, the variation of the section is not perceptible (the Poisson ratio is close to zero) therefore the real…”