On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English

By David Embick. Linguistic Inquiry, 2004

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the identity of roots (2014, background): “…(1996) Chichewa statives and passives, Travis (2000) for Malagasy lexical and syntactic causatives, Sugioka (2001, 2002) on Japanese nominalizations, Embick (2003, 2004) for stative, resultative, and passive participles in English, Fortin (2004) for Minnangkabu causatives, Svenonius (2004) for…”
Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning (2012, background): “In theories that take event structures to represent syntactic constituents (e.g., von Stechow 1995, 1996, 2003, Marantz 1997, Embick 2004, Folli and Harley 2004, Ramchand 2008), the scope difference boils down to an attachment ambiguity, where the possible attachment points are constituents; thus,…”
Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity* (2010, background): “The representations could be recast along neo-Davidsonian lines, as in Rothstein (2004), or as minimalist syntactic structures, as in Borer (2005), Embick (2004) , Ramchand (in press), and Zubizarreta and Oh (2007).”
Distributed Morphology and the Syntax—Morphology Interface (2007, background): “3 A related argument is advanced in Embick (2004) , with reference to the verbal/adjectival passive distinction, a dis-”