Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory

By Luke Wallace, Arko Lucieer, Christopher Stephen Watson, Darren Turner. Remote Sensing, 2012

713 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the development of a low-cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Light Detecting and Ranging (UAV-LiDAR) system and an accompanying workflow to produce 3D point clouds. UAV systems provide an unrivalled combination of high temporal and spatial resolution datasets. The TerraLuma UAV-LiDAR system has been developed to take advantage of these properties and in doing so overcome some of the current limitations of the use of this technology within the forestry industry. A modified processing workflow including a novel trajectory determination algorithm fusing observations from a GPS receiver, an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and a High Definition (HD) video camera is presented. The advantages of this workflow are demonstrated using a rigorous assessment of the spatial accuracy of the final point clouds. It is shown that due to the inclusion of video the horizontal accuracy of the final point cloud improves from 0.61 m to 0.34 m (RMS error assessed against ground control). The effect of the very high density point clouds (up to 62 points per m2) produced by the UAV-LiDAR system on the measurement of tree location, height and crown width are also assessed by performing repeat surveys over individual isolated trees. The standard deviation of tree height is shown to reduce from 0.26 m, when using data with a density of 8 points perm2, to 0.15mwhen the higher density data was used. Improvements in the uncertainty of the measurement of tree location, 0.80 m to 0.53 m, and crown width, 0.69 m to 0.61 m are also shown.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Geology, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dc55ce73f5ab8497698f333a9c602bc4099c111

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Terje Gobakken
  2. Erik Næsset
  3. Erle C. Ellis
  4. Jonathan P. Dandois
  5. Hans Ole Ørka
  6. Stefano Puliti
  7. Katarzyna Dziób
  8. M. Nowak

In Geology

  1. Erle C. Ellis
  2. Jonathan P. Dandois
  3. Arko Lucieer
  4. Darren Turner
  5. Xiaoyu Chen
  6. Rongjun Qin
  7. H. Yao
  8. Luke Wallace

In Insect Science

  1. Terje Gobakken
  2. Erik Næsset
  3. Hans Ole Ørka
  4. Stefano Puliti
  5. Erle C. Ellis
  6. Jonathan P. Dandois
  7. Joanne C. White
  8. Lin Cao

Citations in the corpus