Geometric and transformational properties of Lipschitz domains, Semmes-Kenig-Toro domains, and other classes of finite perimeter domains

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A description of all self-adjoint extensions of the Laplacian and Kreĭn-type resolvent formulas on non-smooth domains (2009, background): “For a more detailed discussion in this regard, the reader is referred to [72].”
On the regularity of domains satisfying a uniform hour–glass condition and a sharp version of the Hopf–Oleinik boundary point principle (2011, methodology): “2) Here is the statement of the result proved in [5] alluded to above.”
$L^p$-Square Function Estimates on Spaces of Homogeneous Type and on Uniformly Rectifiable Sets (2013, background): “[47]), in which scenario this is the point of view adopted in [64, Theorem 4.”
Singular Integrals and Elliptic Boundary Problems on Regular Semmes–Kenig–Toro Domains (2009, methodology): “The invariance of various classes of rough domains under C 1-diffeomorphisms has been studied in [53].”
Weyl law for the volume spectrum (2016, background): “3 of [11] it is shown the existence of a smooth vector field Y in Rn+1 with |Y | = 1 on ∂R and κ > 0 such that Y.”