Effect of tillage and crop establishment, residue management and K fertilization on yield, K use efficiency and apparent K balance under rice-maize system in north-western India

By vinod k. singh, B. S. Dwivedi, Yadvinder-Singh, S. Singh, R. P. Mishra, A. Shukla, S. S. Rathore, K. Shekhawat, K. Majumdar, M. L. Jat. Field crops research (Print), 2018

75 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The rice-maize cropping system (RMS) is an emerging option for diversification of the prevalent rice-wheat system (RWS) in South Asia. Studies underlined the significance of adequate potassium (K) nutrition for sustainable intensification of the RMS. Although studies on combined effects of tillage, residue retention, and nutrient management on crop yields and nutrient use efficiency for the RWS are plenty, such studies are scarce for the RMS. We, therefore, conducted a 5-year field study on sandy loam (Typic Ustochrept) soil at Modipuram, India to evaluate the effects of tillage and crop establishment, residue management and K fertilization on crop productivity, K use efficiencies, changes in soil K status, and apparent K balance under irrigated RMS in north-western India. Three combinations of tillage and crop establishment methods i.e., puddled transplanted rice (TPR) followed by conventional-till maize (TPR/CTM); conventional-till dry direct-seeded rice (CTDSR) followed by CTM (CTDSR/CTM); and zero-till DSR followed by zero-till maize (ZTDSR/ZTM) were considered as main plots. Sub-plot treatments consisted of two residue management options i.e., removal of residues (-R) of both crops, and partial residue retention (5 Mg ha−1) for rice and maize, either at soil surface in zero till (ZT) plots or incorporated into the soil in conventionally-till (CT) plots (+R). The sub-sub plot treatments were no-K application (-K) and 62 kg K ha−1 application (+K) to both rice and maize. Data summed-up for 5 years revealed that rice grain yield and K uptake under TPR were significantly higher (p

Subfields: Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d9456f6d340972f17753703083f4c6dd963398e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

  1. J. Timsina

In Soil Science

  1. J. Timsina

Citations in the corpus