The New Politics of the Welfare State

By D. Byrne. 2003

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d57ae66a7ff05bc79c7e8b5dd616bf72f8641a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Worlds of welfare services and transfers (2008, background): “Many authors have analysed welfare services in this linear way (e.g. Pampel and Williamson, 1988; Garrett, 1998; Rodrik, 1998; Garret and Mitchell, 2001; Huber and Stephens, 2001; Swank, 2001; Castles, 2005).”
Investing in services in West European welfare states (2002, background): “…comparative studies have rather convincingly stressed resilience rather than retrenchment in terms of total public and social spending (see e.g. Pierson, 1994; 2001; Ferrera and Rhodes, 2000; Castles, 2001), Clayton and Pontusson (1998: 82) have suggested that the service components of the…”
Fiscal austerity and the trade-off between public investment and social spending (2009, background): “Scholars in comparative welfare state research have long been studying the politics of reform in ‘hard times’ (Stephens et al. 1999; see also Pierson 1994, 2001).”
In Bed with the Enemy: Some Ideas on the Connections between Neoliberalism and the Welfare State (2005, background): “…systems, where workfare-type welfare reforms are distinguished by ‘integrating people into a social order through participation in work’ as opposed to the ‘anti-dependency ideology which has been part of AngloSaxon systems at least since the 1834 New Poor Law’ (Byrne, 2003: 198; emphasis added).”
The Logic of Funding European Pension Restructuring and the Dangers of Financialisation (2003, background): “By providing a closer analysis of the arguments in favour of pension restructuring I aim to highlight the `ideological moment' within these discourses in an attempt to widen the room for political manoeuvring.”