Effects of different capture techniques on the physiological condition of bonefish Albula vulpes evaluated using field diagnostic tools

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advancing the Science and Practice of Fish Kill Investigations (2011, background): “In addition, there have been numerous advances in field physiology (Costa and Sinervo, 2004) which enable researchers to use portable diagnostic tools in the field to assess fish health and condition (Cooke et al., 2008), providing new and timely information to aid in fish kill investigations.”
The physiological consequences of catch‐and‐release angling: perspectives on experimental design, interpretation, extrapolation and relevance to stakeholders (2013, methodology): “…haemoglobin, blood gases, glucose, ions; e.g. Mandelman & Farrington 2007; Clark et al. 2008; Cooke et al. 2008; Gallagher et al. 2010) has improved the ability to study C&R in field-relevant situations (e.g. on fishing boats; Arlinghaus et al. 2008) including remote fisheries (Cooke et al. 2008).”
Post-release survival of juvenile silky sharks captured in a tropical tuna purse seine fishery (2015, methodology): “To quantify concentrations of lactate, the CG 4+ cartridge was used with the I-STAT portable automated blood chemistry analyzer (Abbott Laboratories) (Cooke et al. 2008, Gallagher et al. 2010).”