Model Reduction for Flow Analysis and Control
By Clarence W. Rowley, Scott T. M. Dawson. 2017
776 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d3a2375f171c643c3ef9a133f5deabaf8b19d4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Steven L. Brunton
- Oliver T. Schmidt
- J. Nathan Kutz
- Aaron Towne
- Tim Colonius
- M. A. Mendez
- J. Buchlin
- M. Balabane
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Steven L. Brunton
- J. Nathan Kutz
- M. A. Mendez
- J. Buchlin
- M. Balabane
- Jean-Christophe Loiseau
- Bethany Lusch
- Bernd R. Noack
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid Flows (2018, methodology): “This research has yielded a wide array of techniques for learning data-driven dynamical models, including balanced truncation, proper orthogonal decomposition, and dynamic mode decomposition [12].”
- Constrained sparse Galerkin regression (2016, methodology): “Over the past decades, identifying robust, accurate and efficient reduced-order models has thus become a central challenge in fluid dynamics and closed-loop flow control (Brunton and Noack, 2015; Fabbiane et al., 2014; Rowley and Dawson, 2016; Sipp and Schmid, 2016).”
- Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics (2019, background): “…possible to construct control laws based on reduced-order models at low computational cost (Bergmann, Cordier & Brancher 2005; Samimy et al. 2007; Rowley & Dawson 2017), since the time-evolving flow field can be represented by a linear combination of the expansion coefficients and the orthogonal…”
- Multi-scale proper orthogonal decomposition of complex fluid flows (2018, methodology): “Recent reviews on data-driven decomposition with emphasis on fluid dynamics are proposed by Taira et al. (2017) and Rowley & Dawson (2017), while an extensive overview on the impact of the big data revolution in turbulence research is presented by Pollard et al. (2017), while Duriez et al. (2017)…”
- Reduced-order modeling of advection-dominated systems with recurrent neural networks and convolutional autoencoders (2020, background): “As such, this field finds extensive application in control [8, 9, 10, 11], multi-fidelity optimization [12], uncertainty quantification [13, 14] and data-assimilation [15] among others.”
- Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: An Overview (2017, neutral): “For further details, refer to the work of Rowley and Dawson [2], Tu et al.”
- Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective (2019, neutral): “[260] C.”
- Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence (2017, methodology): “Reduced-order models seek to project the equations of motion onto a smaller set of variables that approximate the solution in some global sense, typically a linear subspace or a few Fourier modes (see, for example, Rowley & Dawson 2017).”
- Linearly-Recurrent Autoencoder Networks for Learning Dynamics (2017, neutral): “This method is sometimes called overspecification [24] and essentially determines an encoder function into an appropriate small set of features.”
- Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics (2019, background): “DMD is closely related to the Koopman operator (Rowley et al. 2009; Mezic 2013), which is an infinite dimensional linear operator that describes how all measurement functions of the system evolve in time.”
- Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis (2017, methodology): “An efficient algorithm for computing space-only POD modes from snapshots of discrete flow data using the method of snapshots (Sirovich, 1987) is well-known and described in detail in numerous publications (e.g., Rowley & Dawson, 2017; Taira et al., 2017).”